What has happened to physics?

[Pentcho Valev]

Another paper questioning Einstein's postulates:

http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0501/0501051.pdf

Pentcho Valev


valevp wrote:

> Something must have happened to physics. For the moment the most
> popular paper on the internet is
>
> http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0412039
>
> where it is clearly stated that Einstein's "postulates themselves are
> false". Whether they are false or not should be extremely important
> by definition but some unknown development has produced a
> situation in which nobody cares. Rather, there is an ongoing debate
> trying to resolve the problem concerning Einstein's hair. Some
> theoreticians have discovered that the mad hair of Einstein on his
> most popular portrait frightens children and the crisis in physics
> education is due to this deplorable effect. They think that younger
> and sexier portraits should immediately be introduced. Others don't
> find this very important but don't see what else could have caused
> the death of physics education. In any case, the debate is not
> disturbing the fierce celebrations - the intensity of worshipping at
> the traditional protrait seems to be unaffected by Einstein's
> hair.
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Mail group "philphys"
> ESF Network for Philosophical and
> Foundational Problems of Modern Physics
> Help & Archive: http://philosophy.elte.hu/philphys.html
> _______________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________
Mail group "philphys"
ESF Network for Philosophical and
Foundational Problems of Modern Physics
Help & Archive: http://philosophy.elte.hu/philphys.html
_______________________________________________________