[PhilPhys] CFP: Spontaneous Generations Volume 4: Scientific Instruments: Knowledge, Practice, and Culture.

[Eran Tal]

Call for Papers - *Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and
Philosophy of Science - Volume 4: **Scientific Instruments: Knowledge,
Practice, and Culture*.

*Spontaneous Generations* is an open, online, peer-reviewed academic journal
published by graduate students at the Institute for the History and
Philosophy of Science and Technology at the University of Toronto.

In addition to articles for peer review, opinion essays, and book
reviews, *Spontaneous
Generations* is seeking contributions to its focused discussion section.
 This section consists of short peer-reviewed and invited articles devoted
to a particular theme. This year, the theme is "*Scientific Instruments:
Knowledge, Practice, and Culture*." See below for submission guidelines.

We welcome submissions from scholars in all disciplines, including but not
limited to HPS, STS, History, Philosophy, Women's Studies, Sociology,
Anthropology, and Religious Studies. Papers from all periods are welcome.

The journal consists of four sections:

   1. A focused discussion section devoted to Scientific Instruments (see
   below). (1000-3000 words recommended.)
   2. A peer-reviewed section of research papers on various topics in the
   field of HPS. (5000-8000 words recommended.)
   3. A book review section for books published in the last 5 years. (Up to
   1000 words.)
   4. An opinions section that may include a commentary on or a response to
   current concerns, trends, and issues in HPS. (Up to 500 words.)

 With the “practical turn” in history and philosophy of science came a
renewed interest in scientific instruments. Although they have become a
nexus for worries about empiricism and standards of evidence, instruments
only rarely feature as primary sources for scholars in the history and
philosophy of science. Even historians of technology have been accused of
underutilizing the evidence embodied in material objects (Corn 1996). The
fundamental questions are not settled. First, there is no general agreement
as to what counts as a scientific instrument: Are simulations instruments?
Can people function as instruments? Do economic or sociological instruments
operate in the same way as material instruments? There is a second, related
debate about how scientific instruments work: Is there a unified account? Do
instruments produce knowledge or produce effects? Do they extend our senses
(Humphreys 2006) or embody knowledge (Baird 2006)? Third, HPS has seen a
variety of approaches to fitting instruments into broader historical and
philosophical questions about scientific communities and practices: Shapin
and Schaffer (1985) relate instruments to the scientific life, Galison
(1997) gives instrument makers equal footing with theorists and
experimentalists within the trading zone of scientific discourse, and
Hacking (1983) elevates instruments to central importance in the
realism-antirealism debate. Finally, it seems plausible that there are
methodological concerns specific to scientific instruments: What lessons can
we draw from anthropology, material culture, and other allied fields?
We welcome short papers exploring the history and philosophy of scientific
instruments for inclusion in Spontaneous Generations Volume 4. Submissions
should be sent no later than *26 February 2010* in order to be considered
for the 2010 issue.

For more details, and a preview of Volume 3 (2009): Epistemic Boundaries,
please visit the journal homepage at

http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/SpontaneousGenerations/
Please distribute freely. Apologies for cross-postings.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://listbox.elte.hu/mailman/private/philphys/attachments/20091104/4b30a47b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
PhilPhys - Philosophy of Physics Mail Group
Help & Archives: http://phil.elte.hu/PhilPhys