[PhilPhys] Publication announcementment -Kirsh

[marvin kirsh]

Hello: This is a second announcement of the publication of my manuscript "Determining the Determined State : A Sizing of Size From Aside/the Amassing of Mass by a Mass" in Philosophical Papers and Review 4(4) 49-65, 2013. I hope to have bridged a gap between efforts in the social and natural sciences with the strict adherence for description to common perceptional experience at the first person perspective, avoidance of zero, one and infinity, universe birth and death.
   (manuscript attached).

     "Accounting for the World:Symmetry and the creative cognition" is currently under peer review....
      "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they  are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." Albert Einstein (Einstein, A., 2010)
".... Mathematics are well and good but nature keeps dragging us around by the nose"....Albert Einstein (Archer, P., 2010)....
     Though inequality seems ubiquitously  appropriate for understanding I do not think ...
      [Unwitnessible event 1 + unwitnessible event 2 + unwitnessible event 3 = (gives rise to) an event horizon] 
    is coherent....the entire world/universe is entailed, as if simultaneous multiple possibilities for it exist,  rather its possession of plural possibilities to compose it.

    Employing proper correspondences, relativity entails an event where "light got bent". Witness to such an event is precluded, thus an event horizon is precluded.....i.e. from where might one stand, from what perspective might a witness at position A= unbent light, and (then) at position B, bent light to claim such an event. I think thus surfaces the advent of quantum mechanics and entanglement. There is a difficult conceptual obstruction to encompass eternality to a unity (see enclosed "Determining the Determined State...."). 
    I think changes are needed at the axiom level-the world-universe beginning with light, a mirror and an inversion, is unaccountable,  but when followed with mass=number, axiomatic to rational interpretation, is accountable  and supervenes over all.
     The chicken-egg paradox always remains; light might be gotten from mass, mass gotten from light, though it is possible to account for the world in a rational manner beginning with mass-the entity/self/first perspective, exists for the only testimony on the mass side of the equation.. The oscillation, involving again number or mass that may be very large or small, is always essential.... of mass to produce light to produce mass; of alternating light-mass to produce the weave of space, a delay between potential and kinetic from which change from within emerges.   Einstein never actually alluded to refer "let there be light", he was uncertain.
    Certain aspects involving prediction need to be released....if causes exist, and they have an open path on the horizon..... if causes exist, similarly do effects, ad-infinitum. A shrinking rather than expanding world and universe is entailed.
  Please feel free to share with interested colleagues.     

Thank You
Marvin E. Kirsh

http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/PPR/edition/September_2013

Abstract

A philosophical exploration is presented that considers entities such as atoms, electrons, protons, reasoned (in existing physics theories) by induction, to be other than universal building blocks, but artifacts of a sociological struggle that in elemental description is identical with that of all processes of matter and energy. In a universal context both men and materials, when stressed, struggle to accomplish/maintain the free state. The space occupied by cognition, inferred to be the result of the inequality of spaces, is an integral component of both processes and process interpretation; arbitration space, ubiquitous throughout nature, occurred to a vast number of vastnesses, a manifestation of the existence of time dependent mass/number/amount, is argued to be located to the same judging criteria with which principles are determined for sociological purposes: the processes of mind are determined (excuse the pun) to occur as a free state that is
 reflectively equal to what is construed by the intellect as universe. Scientifically determined states are not free states.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://listbox.elte.hu/mailman/private/philphys/attachments/20140811/3de5145d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: article1382366959_Kirsh.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 449392 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://listbox.elte.hu/mailman/private/philphys/attachments/20140811/3de5145d/attachment.pdf>