[PhilPhys] New Paper Announcement

[marvin eli kirsh]

"The Spaces in the Looking Glass: Stilling the frame/ framing the still" has just been released by the journal Philosophy and Cosmology Vol 15 pages 62-83, 2015.
      Lines levered from abstraction can define but need not necessarily contain the world either to dynamic volumes possessing energy, or to matter if they themselves cannot cannot be visualized to surfaces able to physically contain. Perhaps theory seeking to capture visualizable perspective can overdetermine with criteria that underestimates freedoms as it orders potential in a seeming logical fashion, effects reduced space/volume depending on setting, character, and target of applied impulse.   
To download the entire journal issue:
      http://en.bazaluk.com/journals
For an isolated copy:
      http://ssrn.com/abstract=1376065
Abstract:
     The purpose of this writing is to propose a frame of view, a form as the eternal world element, that is compatible with paradox with in the history of ideas, modern discovery as they confront one another. Under special consideration are problems of representation of phenomena, life, the cosmos as the rational facility of mind confronts the physical/perceptual, and itself. Current topics in pursuit are near as diverse and numbered as are the possibilities for a world composed strictly of uniqueness able to fill infinite space. It is assumed that not all of the paths chosen in contemporary pursuits will produce coherent determinations in an appropriate frame able to accommodate a world of nominals in motion, containing motion, and is commensurate with basic physical law, action, reaction, and the propagation of form, change from within. Intended as a potential guiding post for the aim of reason seeking to select, define and capture topics, chosen
 as special examples are the works of logistician/mathematician Lewis Carroll as he presents a paradox of actuality verses the reality of perception in Alice in Wonderland, the theory of relativity of Albert Einstein as he fails to elaborate a mathematics to communicate an inertial frame of reference, and the reconstruction ideas of Jacques Derrida as he refers for contrast with the scientific world view constructed of dualisms, monisms that are conceived to have no opposites. Supporting discussion is evolved from the works of Bertand Russell, Erwin Schrodinger, Jurgen Habermas, Bronislaw Malinowski, Michel Foucault.

Marvin E.Kirsh
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://listbox.elte.hu/mailman/private/philphys/attachments/20150708/204eb2ad/attachment.html>